There are many “holy wars” in tech, and you’d be best served to stop participating in them. These discussions are bikeshedding: Spending an outsized amount of time and energy on trivial details. And when talking in public, they don’t paint you in a good light.
In sport, they can be fun. However, I think getting involved in them, especially in public online spaces, can be detrimental to your career.
The kind of developer that spends time talking about these issues is not the kind of developer that gets the opportunities to work at a higher context. As Patrick MacKenzie says, don’t call yourself a programmer.
Here’s a list of conversations you should avoid, both online and offline.
The Ban List
Is HTML/CSS/SQL “programming”?
Yes. They are all Turing complete. It doesn’t matter if they aren’t. Instead of focusing on what “real coding” is, focus on how people use tools to solve problems. Excel isn’t “coding” but there are sheets out in the wild worth millions.
Is Frontend or backend more difficult?
This isn’t a video game, and you don’t get points for playing on a higher difficulty level. Backend developers have to think more about scalability and security, while developers on the front lines have to work in the wild west that is every conceivable browser and phone.
Tabs vs. Spaces
The “oxford comma” of software development. Most text editors and IDEs can abstract this away from you. Get your team to agree on something, and stick with it. “What I prefer tabs but the rest of the team prefers spaces?” Then you use spaces.
snake_case vs. camelCase
Same as above. These are the types of syntactic decisions that don’t affect readability or maintainability. As long as everyone agrees, either one is fine.
when to squash and rebase commits
I’ve honestly looked at a git history maybe half a dozen times in my career. So long as the code works and is delivering value, I have no interest in the structure of that code’s origin story.
Vim vs. Emacs
Use whatever tools you are most comfortable with, and let others do the same in peace.
My Framework/Language/OS of choice is better than yours.
Do not identify with a technology choice. Frameworks come into fashion and fall out. Like code editors, use what you like and allow others to do so in piece.
That Framework/Language/OS is garbage! Why would anyone use that?
“Rails is dead”
The shortage of COBOL developers in 2020 proves that no technology is ever truly dead. Tell Airbnb, Shopify, Twitch, and Github that Rails is dead. A language’s popularity does not correlate to its quality. People still use Rails (and COBOL) because it gets the job done.
What to do Instead
I would make an exception if someone, especially someone more junior asks about these in good faith. On Reddit, Twitter, with random people is not the place to debate. It’s rare that you’ll actually change anyone’s mind on one of these issues. In the worse cases, you’re tearing someone else’s work and worldview down. Treat these conversations as profane. When you see them, walk away.
Instead of trying to persuade people, invest time in teaching them.
Instead of tearing other people and tools down, build other people up. Go give a shoutout to a manager about a co-worker, or tweet an article you found interesting.
And if you have a suggestion for another argument I should add to the banned list? Tweet at me at @GSto